Cochlear Implantation in Neurological Patients: Case Report and Literature Survey

Cochlear implant (CI) is a reliable solution to restore hearing in people with severe-to-profound hearing loss. The device is made up of internal and external components linked transcutaneously through a magnet that may rise specific issues in people who must undergo brain magnetic resonance (MRI) due to neurological diseases. The description of a case of a CI implantee needing MRI has given us the opportunity to highlight the differences that can be encountered among different neuropathies, either acute or chronic, with the aim of shedding some light for finding a common protocol when facing this important and frequent clinical issue. In particular, the removal of the magnet prior to performing an MRI exam is mandatory for brain diseases ipsilateral to the implanted side, whereas for contralateral side lesions it is less important when using apposite bandage kits. Laryngoscope, 131:E576-E580, 2021.

Keywords: Cochlear implantation; MRI safety; artefact; magnet removal; neurological disease.

© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Similar articles

Öztürk E, Doruk C, Orhan KS, Çelik M, Polat B, Güldiken Y. Öztürk E, et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jun;28(4):e372-e374. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003724. J Craniofac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28328611

Cass ND, Honce JM, O'Dell AL, Gubbels SP. Cass ND, et al. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Aug;40(7):883-891. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002269. Otol Neurotol. 2019. PMID: 31219967 Review.

Kari E, Go JL, Loggins J, Emmanuel N, Fisher LM. Kari E, et al. Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(1):48-57. doi: 10.1159/000488793. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Audiol Neurootol. 2018. PMID: 29936507

Azadarmaki R, Tubbs R, Chen DA, Shellock FG. Azadarmaki R, et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr;150(4):512-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599813518306. Epub 2014 Jan 7. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014. PMID: 24398365 Review.

Vesseur A, Free R, Langereis M, Snels C, Snik A, Ravenswaaij-Arts Cv, Mylanus E. Vesseur A, et al. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1275-83. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001177. Otol Neurotol. 2016. PMID: 27636388

Cited by

Canzi P, Magnetto M, Simoncelli A, Manfrin M, Aprile F, Lafe E, Carlotto E, Avato I, Scribante A, Preda L, Benazzo M. Canzi P, et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;279(6):2889-2898. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y. Epub 2021 Aug 9. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 34370074 Free PMC article.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Erhardt JB, Fuhrer E, Gruschke OG, et al. Should patients with brain implants undergo MRI? J Neural Eng 2018;15:041002.
    1. Todt I, Rademacher G, Mittmann P, Wagner J, Mutze S, Ernst A. MRI artifacts and cochlear implant positioning at 3 T in vivo. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:972-976.
    1. Carlson ML, Neff BA, Link MJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implant magnet in place. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:965-971.
    1. Bawazeer N, Vuong H, Riehm S, Veillon F, Charpiot A. Magnetic resonance imaging after cochlear implants. J Otol 2019;14:22-25.
    1. Wagner F, Wimmer W, Leidolt L, et al. Significant artifact reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the use of a Cochlear implant with removable magnet: an experimental human cadaver study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132483.

    Publication types

    Case Reports